Compare

Against the other HP games

Data last checked: · how we verify numbers

Defenders of Hogwarts is the newest Harry Potter board game — and the odd one out. Hogwarts Battle (2016) remains the line’s benchmark, ranked 466th on BoardGameGeek with a 7.3 average from some 22,000 ratings [BGG, 2026-10-12], while Defenders competes on something no other licensed HP game offers: MinaLima’s artwork and a one-versus-many structure — with a single winner, not a co-op.

Scope note: we have not played any of these games; this comparison is built from the official rulebook, BoardGameGeek data checked 2026-10-12 and named published reviews.

The benchmark: Hogwarts Battle

Defenders is a competitive, asymmetric deck-builder. So the fairest comparisons are other deck-builders — and the HP shelf has three distinct flavours of them:

  • Harry Potter: Hogwarts Battle (The Op, 2016) — the co-operative campaign deck-builder that plays through all seven books, with two well-liked expansions (The Monster Box of Monsters, 7.6; The Charms and Potions, 7.8 [BGG]). It is the highest-rated HP board game by a wide margin and the default answer to “which HP game should I buy?”.
  • Hogwarts Battle – Defence Against the Dark Arts (The Op, 2019) — the two-player, head-to-head spin-off. Mechanically this is Defenders’ closest cousin: competitive deck-building with direct confrontation, but faster (30–60 minutes), lighter on the wallet, and rated higher (7.1, rank 1,846 [BGG]).
  • Harry Potter: Death Eaters Rising (The Op, 2019) — co-operative dice-and-cards against Voldemort’s encroachment; steadier reputation at 6.9 [BGG].

Everything else on the licensed shelf is either a light family game (House Cup Competition, Clue: Harry Potter, Mischief in Diagon Alley), a two-player Quidditch simulation (Catch the Snitch), or a 2004 curiosity (Hogwarts Dueling Club).

The matrix

Harry Potter board games compared — players, length, weight, co-op status, BGG rank and score, all read from BoardGameGeek on 2026-10-12 [BGG]
GamePlayers (best)LengthWeightCo-op?BGG rankBGG scoreHow HP-flavoured?
Defenders of Hogwarts (2026, MinaLima)2–5 (best 4)90–180 min1.33No — single winner30,5125.07*Original story, MinaLima prop-style art; no film characters
Hogwarts Battle (2016, The Op)2–4 (best 2 & 4)30–60 min2.08Yes4667.3Replays all seven books with the film’s cast
— Monster Box of Monsters (2017, expansion)——2.64Yes—7.6Film creatures join the campaign
— Charms and Potions (2020, expansion)——2.00Yes—7.8More of the same campaign, loved
Hogwarts Battle – Defence Against the Dark Arts (2019, The Op)2 (best 2)30–60 min1.78No — head-to-head1,8467.1Duelling deck-builder, two players
Death Eaters Rising (2019, The Op)2–4 (best 3)45–90 min2.32Yes3,7316.9Hold the school against Voldemort
House Cup Competition (2020, The Op)2–4 (best 4)75 min2.19No — friendly contest5,5706.7Play a school year, win the House Cup
Clue: Harry Potter (2008, Hasbro/The Op)3–5 (best 4–5)30 min1.57No5,7486.2Deduction wearing the theme
Catch the Snitch (2023, Knight Games)2 (best 2)40–60 min3.00No18,1816.1Quidditch — oddly heavier than Defenders
Mischief in Diagon Alley (2022, The Op)3–515 min1.00No22,7076.4Ten-minute family chaos in the shops
Hogwarts Dueling Club (2004, Mattel)2–4 (best 4)45 min1.67No28,6395.4Mattel-era licensed curiosity

Warning

*The 5.07 average is not a quality verdict. Of Defenders’ 138 BGG ratings, 67 are 1s and 56 are 10s — a polarised ratings battle around the IP, with the middle of the scale almost empty [BGG user data]. See why the BGG score looks so strange before quoting it anywhere.

The unofficial shelf

Two unofficial titles keep surfacing in the same searches as the licensed line: Harry Potter Miniatures Adventure Game and Scoundrels of London. We could not verify their current BGG figures in our 2026-10-12 check, so they appear in no table here — treating them as data would break our own rules. If your interest is the licence rather than the deck-building, they are worth a look on their own terms; just note they sit outside Warner Bros.’ licensed board-game line.

What only Defenders does

  • MinaLima art direction. The studio behind the films’ graphic props — the Marauder’s Map, Harry’s Hogwarts acceptance letter, the Daily Prophet — designed the entire game: 200+ components and 100+ illustrated cards in one coherent visual language [official]. No other HP board game has this.
  • Asymmetric one-vs-many with a single winner. One player runs the Dark Arts side against up to four houses — but the houses are not allies: only one player wins [official rulebook + the development team on BGG]. The campaign page’s framing led many people to expect a co-op; it is not one.
  • The twist. Its weight of 1.33 is lighter than everything in the matrix except Mischief in Diagon Alley, while its 90–180-minute length is longer than all of them [BGG]. A very light core stretched over a long session is the combination reviewers most often praise for its look and side-eye for its pace.

Versus our analysis

If you want the deepest HP deck-building experience, Hogwarts Battle plus its two expansions is the stronger buy on every mechanical count. If you want MinaLima’s artwork as a playable, collectible object — an “art book you can play” — Defenders is genuinely alone in the licensed line, and that is the honest reason to pick it.

Which one fits you

  • Co-op family nights through the books → Hogwarts Battle, adding the expansions once you’re hooked.
  • Two-player duels → Hogwarts Battle – Defence Against the Dark Arts.
  • One-versus-many tension → look outside the licence: Not Alone or Fury of Dracula scratch it harder (see Same money, other games).
  • Artwork and collecting → Defenders of Hogwarts — this is its irreplaceable angle.
  • Most game per pound → also outside the licence: Clank! or Tyrants of the Underdark.

Sources


Related reading